no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Blitzing: how it should be Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-03 15:36:41 (ID: 15268) |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
I do wonder! Never think about that somebody programms a game with so much bit knowledge of American Football 
But good you are listening even if wording of things in your "programm understanding" are others than "ours fanatic football fans" *GÄHN* |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2011-11-05 00:12:14 (ID: 15432) Report Abuse |
|
Blitzing, as it is now, is lowering the sacks numbers.
Before: the DEs go to the QB EVERY snap. Now: the DEs don't go for the QB; only (maximun) 15% of the snaps we have a blitz from a LB or a SF (at the price of a weakening of the defense). Result: at this price, blitzes are not convenient. My opinion: the DEs must go EVERY snap for the QB (this is NOT a blitz, it's only their job!) and LBs, SFs and CBs can blitz at various percentage. EDIT Look at today's friendlies: ZERO sacks! Last edited on 2011-11-05 00:28:09 by panoramix |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-05 09:50:50 (ID: 15449) |
|
I am working on that issue. There will be a new version of blitzing soon, where the DEs are going for the QB "all the time", while SF/LB are blitzing based on the playbook settings...Patience pls
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2011-11-05 10:46:29 (ID: 15458) Report Abuse |
|
Thanks Pete!
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
strepitoso
|
posted: 2011-11-05 11:41:55 (ID: 15463) Report Abuse |
|
Thank you very much, dear Admin
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2011-11-06 02:21:55 (ID: 15514) Report Abuse |
|
I know the discussion may be over here, but I was wondering tonight:
wouldn't it make more sense for DE to rush the passer on plays where the defense is set to "Expect pass" and for DEs to play the run when the defense is set to "Expect run"? @Admin: Please ignore this post if this makes your life even more complicated than this whole blitz thing has already made it. Thanks for putting so much work into this game. It's an enormous improvement over -TOG- and you should be proud of it!! Awesome job! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-06 10:48:08 (ID: 15520) |
|
Lee1950 wrote:
I know the discussion may be over here, but I was wondering tonight: wouldn't it make more sense for DE to rush the passer on plays where the defense is set to "Expect pass" and for DEs to play the run when the defense is set to "Expect run"? @Admin: Please ignore this post if this makes your life even more complicated than this whole blitz thing has already made it. Thanks for putting so much work into this game. It's an enormous improvement over -TOG- and you should be proud of it!! Awesome job! That makes sense, absolutely. But I have to delay this for the next big u p d a t e after season 2, I am afraid. The time to test a new feature til this offseason is rather short now. And thank you, doing the best I can - even it is not always funny. Especially on those copycat calls that come up here and there...that's simply unfair, since it is not true |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Blitzing: how it should be | |
