Login
no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Introducing Coaches (Head coach and Assistent coaches) Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 48 50 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2012-01-16 17:27:32 (ID: 24229) Report Abuse |
|
In addition to the game day bonus, I also wanted to focus my training on the running game. So High CP RB Assistant Coach and OL AC.
I figure a strong OL never hurts, because later I want to focus on my passing game. My RB AC is older than I am  , so I'm hoping he stays around another couple seasons until my RB cadre is where I want it. Then when he retires, I'll switch to training the passing game.
btw - I was not impressed with my 97 CP head coach's debut. 0-7 loss.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-01-16 18:42:25 (ID: 24240) Report Abuse |
|
Lee1950 wrote:
btw - I was not impressed with my 97 CP head coach's debut. 0-7 loss. Because effects are not active already i think this is not reason for your loss. As i understand such type of engine changes only at start of new season or i understand wrong? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-01-16 18:53:29 (ID: 24242) Report Abuse |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
Lee1950 wrote:
btw - I was not impressed with my 97 CP head coach's debut. 0-7 loss. Because effects are not active already i think this is not reason for your loss. As i understand such type of engine changes only at start of new season or i understand wrong? No, you are right. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2012-01-16 19:54:16 (ID: 24252) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
Turtlemania wrote:
Lee1950 wrote:
btw - I was not impressed with my 97 CP head coach's debut. 0-7 loss. Because effects are not active already i think this is not reason for your loss. As i understand such type of engine changes only at start of new season or i understand wrong? No, you are right. Oh. I guess that means my 3-game losing streak is my fault.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-01-17 08:24:02 (ID: 24291) Report Abuse | |
|
Peter, you have the exp-gain-formular under the con-chapter.
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-01-17 08:39:04 (ID: 24294) |
|
jack6 wrote:
Peter, you have the exp-gain-formular under the con-chapter. Ups, fixed  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-02-09 18:53:45 (ID: 27663) |
|
Later this evening we will activate coaches for the simulation engine.
As written earlier: the higher an ACs CP is, the better players on that position will perform. This means nothing else than a TE Coach will increase the performance only if the TE is set to be a TE in the player details, and is playing on the field as TE! The math $factor=(($cp + 45 + 1000) / 1100) + (rand(-50,50) / 10000) This will result in something like +-5%, if the player is playing his position, on the skills the AC is affecting. There is no direct advantage from your Head coach at the moment. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-02-09 19:14:09 (ID: 27664) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
This will result in something like +-5%, if the player is playing his position, on the skills the AC is affecting. Without do any math just a simple question: When i have AC: it is possible, that the player play worse than they could? Dont get me wrong, but then please i want to have some more details (formula) what happens when i do not have AC at all! Screw the bonus on training - then i want to decide if its worth to pay Millions per seasons on ACs just for a "random" chance Please dont get me wrong: i like random factors, but not when its total illogic - my 5 cents. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-02-09 19:21:48 (ID: 27665) |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
Admin wrote:
This will result in something like +-5%, if the player is playing his position, on the skills the AC is affecting. Without do any math just a simple question: When i have AC: it is possible, that the player play worse than they could? Dont get me wrong, but then please i want to have some more details (formula) what happens when i do not have AC at all! Screw the bonus on training - then i want to decide if its worth to pay Millions per seasons on ACs just for a "random" chance Please dont get me wrong: i like random factors, but not when its total illogic - my 5 cents. No coaches: the player will act based on the CP shown in the COaches Overview. There is a little chance on Low CP coaches the player could act worse than without a Coach, yes. Consider this to be a "penalty" for the YA-TP-Hunters. The randomness in this formula is very very ... very low. So the COach is the trigger, not the RNG. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-02-09 19:32:52 (ID: 27666) Report Abuse |
|
Ok and thanks for quick reply!
Admin wrote:
This will result in something like +-5%, if the player is playing his position, on the skills the AC is affecting. This range is referring to AC from 0 to 100 - correct? Sure you can guess i did maths meanwhile - so its just for cross check and confirmation  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 48 50 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Introducing Coaches (Head coach and Assistent coaches) | |
