no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
Main / Discussions / Player Injuries - realism vs fun Search Forum | |||||||
Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 8 9 10 > >| | |||||||
Poll: Should we add game ending injuries? See the details below!,
Poll closed,
votes: 140
|
|||||||
Poster | Message | ||||||
posted: 2018-08-26 10:22:24 (ID: 100132196) Report Abuse | |||||||
|
|||||||
Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2018-08-26 12:33:51 (ID: 100132198) Report Abuse | ||||||
Meitheisman wrote:
No because of the lack of options for substitutions. If my #1 QB leaves the game I want my #2 to play as many plays as possible but if my #2 gets an in-game injury I need to have a #3. We can have 3 players in the DC but they can't be ranked #1, #2 and #3 and asked to sub only in case of injury. Sorry if it's already been mentioned, I've not read the entire thread. If we're going to have game ending injuries I think we need more options to adjust our depth chart. Another example. I usually rotate 3 players at DE. If one of them is out for the game I don't want my other 2 DE to play every snap, I would like my #4 DE to come in and rotate with the other 2. There is no option for us to do that in RZA. |
|||||||
Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
gabriel06
|
posted: 2018-08-26 17:09:01 (ID: 100132206) Report Abuse | ||||||
simple question asked via poll
simple and straightforward answer given no doubting this...lets move on. |
|||||||
Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
posted: 2018-08-27 22:20:09 (ID: 100132235) Report Abuse | |||||||
Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
gabriel06
|
posted: 2018-08-28 08:00:09 (ID: 100132240) Report Abuse | ||||||
|
|||||||
Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2018-09-03 07:12:19 (ID: 100132407) Report Abuse | ||||||
Meitheisman wrote:
Meitheisman wrote:
No because of the lack of options for substitutions. If my #1 QB leaves the game I want my #2 to play as many plays as possible but if my #2 gets an in-game injury I need to have a #3. We can have 3 players in the DC but they can't be ranked #1, #2 and #3 and asked to sub only in case of injury. Sorry if it's already been mentioned, I've not read the entire thread. If we're going to have game ending injuries I think we need more options to adjust our depth chart. Another example. I usually rotate 3 players at DE. If one of them is out for the game I don't want my other 2 DE to play every snap, I would like my #4 DE to come in and rotate with the other 2. There is no option for us to do that in RZA. I understand that I am in the minority that voted no but could the point I made twice above get addressed please? Are we going to have more options in the depth chart to help us adjust in case of injuries or not? |
|||||||
Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
posted: 2018-09-03 08:24:08 (ID: 100132408) Report Abuse | |||||||
Meitheisman wrote:
I understand that I am in the minority that voted no but could the point I made twice above get addressed please? Are we going to have more options in the depth chart to help us adjust in case of injuries or not? I would also really like this |
|||||||
Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
McKay93
|
posted: 2018-09-03 09:07:11 (ID: 100132410) Report Abuse | ||||||
Meitheisman wrote:
I understand that I am in the minority that voted no but could the point I made twice above get addressed please? Are we going to have more options in the depth chart to help us adjust in case of injuries or not? I agree that this has to be a thing if this gets implemented. Having at least a 1st, 2nd and 3rd String option is mandatory (With 3rd String being that neither 1st nor 2nd String being ticked) |
|||||||
Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
Brewnoe
|
posted: 2018-09-07 07:52:55 (ID: 100132481) Report Abuse | ||||||
McKay93 wrote:
Meitheisman wrote:
I understand that I am in the minority that voted no but could the point I made twice above get addressed please? Are we going to have more options in the depth chart to help us adjust in case of injuries or not? I agree that this has to be a thing if this gets implemented. Having at least a 1st, 2nd and 3rd String option is mandatory (With 3rd String being that neither 1st nor 2nd String being ticked) I'm in the majority that didn't vote Please ... some combination of more strings and/or a block on game-ending injuries if someone on the depth chart has a training injury or an earlier game-ending injury would be nice (or super-intelligent decisions on which player not on the depth chart subs in) I've got a STT emergency QB. Now I think i need to switch some lineman to kicking/punting training just in case. I miss Sergio Shuler Who knew an almost well-balanced except for only having one Strong Leg running back would have that much more value. Side note ... I am already training a Long Carrying Kicker/punter |
|||||||
Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
Captain Jack
|
posted: 2018-09-07 17:21:56 (ID: 100132495) Report Abuse | ||||||
McKay93 wrote:
Meitheisman wrote:
I understand that I am in the minority that voted no but could the point I made twice above get addressed please? Are we going to have more options in the depth chart to help us adjust in case of injuries or not? I agree that this has to be a thing if this gets implemented. Having at least a 1st, 2nd and 3rd String option is mandatory (With 3rd String being that neither 1st nor 2nd String being ticked) Totally agree. We can't have players being selected randomly to fill injury slots if we do not have the option of adding players into the depth chart to cope with such injuries. |
|||||||
Quote Reply Edit | |||||||
reply Mark this thread unread | |||||||
Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 8 9 10 > >| | |||||||
Main / Discussions / Player Injuries - realism vs fun |