no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Delegation of duties... Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
KingOfTh3Hil
|
posted: 2011-11-06 17:52:14 (ID: 15585) Report Abuse |
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Swordpriest1
|
posted: 2011-11-06 19:01:29 (ID: 15590) Report Abuse |
|
I like the coaches having attributes like players.... And yes coaches are well versed in football but coaches DO NOT switch over from offensive specialist to defensive specialist in their careers.
Head coaches by virtue of their position will be involved in all aspects of the game but assistant coaches are generally position coach specialist who then become coordinators for that positions offensive or defensive side... then head coach. Again I'm asking to keep it simple. A designated OL coach shouldnt be able to switch to DB coach. Also I dislike coaches getting "better" via offseason seminars or whatever. I dont remember a single coach ever saying they got to where they are based on some powerpoint presentation. From what I understand coaches rise/fall based on how they work well with players and the other coaching staff. If the head coach's philosophy and the assistants coach's philosophy arent together then it wont work. If the coach's philosophy doesnt go in line with the skills your players have then it wont work. Coach's dont get "better".. what they get are players who work within their system (the more valuable coaches have a broader system) and the team does well.. or they fail. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-06 19:04:15 (ID: 15591) |
|
I don't like experience by seminars, too. Experience comes from playing games, even for coaches. And I don't like the "switch your coach" thing, Coaches are the Coaches they are. If you hire a DB coach, how the hell you could expect to switch him to QB coach?
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2011-11-06 19:07:10 (ID: 15592) Report Abuse |
|
I would not involve coaches vor every position (QB,DB,DL...). Keep it simple with one offense coordinator and a defence coordinator, may be a asistant coach.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-06 19:30:52 (ID: 15594) |
|
Buffalo wrote:
I would not involve coaches vor every position (QB,DB,DL...). Keep it simple with one offense coordinator and a defence coordinator, may be a asistant coach. Hm, then I would skip it... Normally I would split it into QB Receivers (TE/WR) Rush (HB/FB) OL DL LB DB Special Team By this you can stretch your team into the one or other direction. But it should be a way you can't have all of them at "full throttle"... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
KingOfTh3Hil
|
posted: 2011-11-06 20:01:28 (ID: 15595) Report Abuse |
|
maybe not be able to change position then, but just the idea that in some way have coaches like we have players would in general be nicer..
its not that great in just having bars where you can decide a number from 1-20 on how much training you will have on that area. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2011-11-06 21:25:29 (ID: 15602) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
Buffalo wrote:
I would not involve coaches vor every position (QB,DB,DL...). Keep it simple with one offense coordinator and a defence coordinator, may be a asistant coach. Hm, then I would skip it... Normally I would split it into QB Receivers (TE/WR) Rush (HB/FB) OL DL LB DB Special Team By this you can stretch your team into the one or other direction. But it should be a way you can't have all of them at "full throttle"... I like where you are going with this... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Swordpriest1
|
posted: 2011-11-06 22:59:33 (ID: 15616) Report Abuse |
|
my thing is... If you run your team and you have what the admin calls "full throttle" it would cost you so much money to maintain it'd be too much a gamble for some managers. Realistically you would only want that type of coaching delegation on a team that is really good and maximizing their finances. The gamble is... if your team starts to lose you wont be making the same income.. meaning you'll either have to fire coaching staff or release players for additional income.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2011-11-07 07:33:48 (ID: 15625) Report Abuse | |
|
First thing:
Coaches DO switch their positions, even today. Yes normally the stay in "their" branch, so like WR->OC->HC or DL->DC->HC. But it also happens that they switch: Bill Belichicks Career: Baltimore Colts (special assistant) Detroit Lions (asst special teams coach) Detroit Lions (wide receivers coach) (tight ends coach) Denver Broncos (asst special teams coach) (defensive assistant) New York Giants (special teams coach) (defensive assistant) New York Giants (linebackers coach) (special teams coach) New York Giants (defensive coordinator) Cleveland Browns (head coach) New England Patriots (assistant head coach) (secondary coach) New York Jets (asst head coach) (defensive backs coach) New England Patriots (head coach) Often that happens in the beginning of their career. Once they are set, like DC or even HC, they flip flop most of the time max between the DC and HC or OC and HC. If you put that on skills: once the are (on a scale of 0 to 50) at 25 or 35 it is not feasiable to switch. Why not letting it be open as it is with the players positions? You can put a penalty on switching after a few games/seasons ... second: Why not letting all positions have a coach and the manager can decide which coach he wants to have there. So a caoch can have more than one position to coach or even ALL or just one. It depends on the income of the team and the level of coaching skills. This would be a very open system. The limit is the money the coaches want. The higher the skills, the more they want. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
KingOfTh3Hil
|
posted: 2011-11-07 09:12:36 (ID: 15629) Report Abuse |
|
jack6 wrote:
First thing: Coaches DO switch their positions, even today. Yes normally the stay in "their" branch, so like WR->OC->HC or DL->DC->HC. But it also happens that they switch: Bill Belichicks Career: Baltimore Colts (special assistant) Detroit Lions (asst special teams coach) Detroit Lions (wide receivers coach) (tight ends coach) Denver Broncos (asst special teams coach) (defensive assistant) New York Giants (special teams coach) (defensive assistant) New York Giants (linebackers coach) (special teams coach) New York Giants (defensive coordinator) Cleveland Browns (head coach) New England Patriots (assistant head coach) (secondary coach) New York Jets (asst head coach) (defensive backs coach) New England Patriots (head coach) Often that happens in the beginning of their career. Once they are set, like DC or even HC, they flip flop most of the time max between the DC and HC or OC and HC. If you put that on skills: once the are (on a scale of 0 to 50) at 25 or 35 it is not feasiable to switch. Why not letting it be open as it is with the players positions? You can put a penalty on switching after a few games/seasons ... second: Why not letting all positions have a coach and the manager can decide which coach he wants to have there. So a caoch can have more than one position to coach or even ALL or just one. It depends on the income of the team and the level of coaching skills. This would be a very open system. The limit is the money the coaches want. The higher the skills, the more they want. I really like this idea  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Delegation of duties... | |
