Login
no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / American Football Catenaccio - or Why you should set different rules on... Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-14 21:02:44 (ID: 16598) |
|
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
strepitoso
|
posted: 2011-11-14 21:07:03 (ID: 16599) Report Abuse |
|
Their last 2 supercup matches are won 3-0
![]() Last edited on 2011-11-14 21:07:51 by strepitoso |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
4lb3rt0
|
posted: 2011-11-14 21:50:26 (ID: 16611) Report Abuse |
|
I agree. I think also Pro Set and Wishbone can run, if you want a running game. I understand the winning wish, but in this way is so boring.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
TombKing
|
posted: 2011-11-15 12:25:56 (ID: 16646) Report Abuse |
|
Perfect example how to abuse the game engine.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2011-11-15 14:09:31 (ID: 16653) Report Abuse |
|
I have most success on running game with Wishbone or Shotgun. Only Big-I and I-Formation is not very budding.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
4lb3rt0
|
posted: 2011-11-15 19:22:00 (ID: 16677) Report Abuse |
|
strepitoso wrote:
Their last 2 supercup matches are won 3-0 ![]() griff in gras defeated me 17-9 in this way: always I-formation match Last edited on 2011-11-15 19:22:58 by 4lb3rt0 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
kyoshuke
|
posted: 2011-11-15 21:30:44 (ID: 16692) Report Abuse |
|
4lb3rt0 wrote:
strepitoso wrote:
Their last 2 supercup matches are won 3-0 ![]() griff in gras defeated me 17-9 in this way: always I-formation match I think that after X consecutive identical plays, the Defense must start to defend accordingly (Pass or Rush). Moreover after X identical plays more, Defense must get a bonus and start to sack/block/intercept more and more... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-11-16 10:25:46 (ID: 16747) |
|
kyoshuke wrote:
I think that after X consecutive identical plays, the Defense must start to defend accordingly (Pass or Rush). Moreover after X identical plays more, Defense must get a bonus and start to sack/block/intercept more and more... It is like this in the engine, but the bonus on right assumin the next play is not that high |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2011-11-16 11:27:33 (ID: 16770) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
kyoshuke wrote:
I think that after X consecutive identical plays, the Defense must start to defend accordingly (Pass or Rush). Moreover after X identical plays more, Defense must get a bonus and start to sack/block/intercept more and more... It is like this in the engine, but the bonus on right assumin the next play is not that high I think, this bonus should be increased. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
kyoshuke
|
posted: 2011-11-16 22:37:56 (ID: 16861) Report Abuse |
|
dark_wing wrote:
Admin wrote:
kyoshuke wrote:
I think that after X consecutive identical plays, the Defense must start to defend accordingly (Pass or Rush). Moreover after X identical plays more, Defense must get a bonus and start to sack/block/intercept more and more... It is like this in the engine, but the bonus on right assumin the next play is not that high I think, this bonus should be increased. me too, a drastic increase! No coach would tell his guys to play always the same play/plays in a game.... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / American Football Catenaccio - or Why you should set different rules on... | |


