Community - American Football Management Simulator
AdBlocker active? It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org. The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site. Thank you very much!
Main / Suggestions / Champ of Champs - Scheduling error - how to handle it Search Forum
Navigation: |<   1 2  >   >|  
Rating:
Rating
Poster Message
Admin

Contact
posted: 2011-11-27 10:05:03 (ID: 17762)
I have to admit the manual and the Champ of Champs Scheduler differ from each other

It should be like this:

The League Bowl winners enter this competition, and needed spots are filled with bots.

It is like this:

The Bowl participant enter the competition, and needed spots are filled with bots.

Since the CoC games start late in the season, we have some time to make a decision here. Please vote:

10 stars: keep it as it is, change the manual, and let both Bowl participants enter the Champ of Champs competition

1 star: change the behavior of the scheduler so it works as described in the manual.

I will run this poll until 18th of December 2011. Votes by managers that are affected won't count - I will remove them on the 18th...

Last edited on 2011-11-27 10:15:51 by Admin

Quote   Reply   Edit  
bamastrac
posted: 2011-11-27 19:57:50 (ID: 17818) Report Abuse
i will admit that i am still trying to grasp how things should work so forgive me if i have misunderstood , on the topic of champs of champs bowl games . i do not see the reason for any bots being in on a championship bowl game, if there is a worthy runner up human owned team.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Admin

Contact
posted: 2011-11-27 20:00:39 (ID: 17821)
bamastrac wrote:
i will admit that i am still trying to grasp how things should work so forgive me if i have misunderstood , on the topic of champs of champs bowl games . i do not see the reason for any bots being in on a championship bowl game, if there is a worthy runner up human owned team.


This was made to avoid any "infights"...imagine we have one Bowl winner less than needed. Now we pick 1 runnerup.. what are the criteria? What will the other 23 runnerups think? This is why bots are added

Bute I am open for any other suggestion.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Kottan
Bretzfeld Bandits

Germany   Kottan owns a supporter account   Kottan acts as Mentor for beginners

Joined: 2011-09-04/S00
Posts: 1085
Top Manager



 
posted: 2011-11-27 20:58:52 (ID: 17825) Report Abuse
Pete, I read this in the manual:

1)"The Champ of Champs competition is dedicated to those teams that won their League Bowl the season before."

and further:

2)"The last two teams that survived this fight will play the Champ of Champs Bowl."

To 1) Only the Bowl Winner enter the CoC
To 2) Both Bowl participants will enter the CoC

That contradicts itself. And have to be corrected.

I suggest: Let the scedule, as it is. Its a hard way to climb the bowl and the Runner Up is worth to play in the CoC.

But, did the CoC in Season 3 will be played with the League 1 and the League 2 Champions? My opinion is, that only the League 1 Champions should be qualified for the CoC. This CoC is an exeption, cause we had no team in League 1 last season. In this case, there will are 16 teams in the CoC race next season.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
NYDOGS
posted: 2011-11-27 21:21:05 (ID: 17827) Report Abuse
I'm OK with the schedule this year.

For Season 3 and further, I would suggest to Pick Winners and Runners Up of 1.1 and Winners of 2.X... You would have 32 Teams without picking Bots
Quote   Reply   Edit  
TuffGong
posted: 2011-11-27 22:18:41 (ID: 17833) Report Abuse
All conference winners should take part. ie.(Bowl runners up as well)
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Lee1950
posted: 2011-11-27 22:51:47 (ID: 17835) Report Abuse
NYDOGS wrote:
I'm OK with the schedule this year.

For Season 3 and further, I would suggest to Pick Winners and Runners Up of 1.1 and Winners of 2.X... You would have 32 Teams without picking Bots
Quote   Reply   Edit  
bamastrac
posted: 2011-11-29 07:52:29 (ID: 17999) Report Abuse
Admin wrote:
bamastrac wrote:
i will admit that i am still trying to grasp how things should work so forgive me if i have misunderstood , on the topic of champs of champs bowl games . i do not see the reason for any bots being in on a championship bowl game, if there is a worthy runner up human owned team.


This was made to avoid any "infights"...imagine we have one Bowl winner less than needed. Now we pick 1 runnerup.. what are the criteria? What will the other 23 runnerups think? This is why bots are added

Bute I am open for any other suggestion.



i believe a simple point system based off of (Offense rating (1-16) would account for 15% of overall grade / Defense rating (1 -16) would account for 15% of overall grade / Special Teams rating (1-16) 15% of overall grade / Strength of Schedule would account for 50% of overall grade / maybe a activity rating would account for 5% of overall grade given) could work. just a question how many teams are invited to the champion bowl game ? and how many leagues are involved ?

Last edited on 2011-11-29 08:01:58 by bamastrac

Quote   Reply   Edit  
Tarjan
posted: 2011-11-29 11:48:00 (ID: 18009) Report Abuse
NYDOGS wrote:
I'm OK with the schedule this year.

For Season 3 and further, I would suggest to Pick Winners and Runners Up of 1.1 and Winners of 2.X... You would have 32 Teams without picking Bots[/quote

]
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Admin

Contact
posted: 2011-12-19 17:52:30 (ID: 20332)
Based on 17 valid votes - the others were put by participating teams and therefore invalid - we will keep the schedule as it is, and check the manual again for mistakes on this topic.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
reply   Mark this thread unread
Navigation: |<   1 2  >   >|  
Main / Suggestions / Champ of Champs - Scheduling error - how to handle it