no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / How we can to improve passing game. Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 5 6 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2011-12-13 17:39:08 (ID: 19851) Report Abuse |
|
Also: Experience could be included in decision making for QBs.....
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2011-12-15 03:46:54 (ID: 20030) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
dark_wing wrote:
Admin wrote:
Pass Snap (C-QB) - receiverselection - block calculation (5 OL - 3-5 DL) - blitz calculation - coveragecalculation (WR - CB/OLB) - catching calculation - interception calculation - rush calculation, based on the point of catching and the left backfield My offer. Snap (C-QB) - block calculation (5 OL - 3-5 DL) - blitz calculation - coveragecalculation (WR - CB/OLB) - receiverselection (based on coveragecalculation, and QB vision and intellect) - catching calculation - interception calculation - rush calculation The actual calulation could is not right and not wrong. I think a QB has his primary target in his mind before the snap. Depending on the coverage and blizing of the D, he would chance his target, if he is a good QB. So I suggest to add a chance that the QB can change his target. Snap - Target selection - block calculation - block calculation (5 OL - 3-5 DL) - blitz calculation - coveragecalculation (WR - CB/OLB) % for other target selection, if there is a blitz or the target well covered - catching calculation The % could be depend on Intelligence,Passion, Vision Intelligence + [(Passing/2)+(Vision/2)=XX% that the QB chance his target Example: 40 INT + (24/2) + (20/2) = 62% that the QB s e l e c t another target I think it is to low. Another case Intelligence*1,5 +Vision/2 Example: 40*1,5 + 20/2 = 70 % |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
JonnyP
|
posted: 2011-12-15 08:59:06 (ID: 20050) Report Abuse |
|
I don't think the passing skill should be involved in the selection process of an alternative receiver - surely the passinig skill is his ability to actually deliver the pass once he had decided where he is throwing?
(Int*1.5)+(vision*0.5) ought to be enough. edit - exactly as dark_wing said - note to self - read ALL posts before posting  Last edited on 2011-12-15 08:59:51 by JonnyP |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2011-12-15 09:32:15 (ID: 20054) Report Abuse |
|
JonnyP wrote:
(Int*1.5)+(vision*0.5) ought to be enough. Or (Int*1.5)+(vision*0.5)+(Experience*0.5) Making the 2nd/3rd/etc read gets easier with experience Or ((Int*1.5)+(vision*0.5)+(Experience*0.5))*TC/100 Would effectively limit new QBs to just the primary receiver, although a very smart experienced QB might still have some success. Last edited on 2011-12-15 09:35:04 by Lee1950 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2011-12-15 14:59:08 (ID: 20083) Report Abuse |
|
Lee1950 wrote:
JonnyP wrote:
(Int*1.5)+(vision*0.5) ought to be enough. Or (Int*1.5)+(vision*0.5)+(Experience*0.5) Making the 2nd/3rd/etc read gets easier with experience Or ((Int*1.5)+(vision*0.5)+(Experience*0.5))*TC/100 Would effectively limit new QBs to just the primary receiver, although a very smart experienced QB might still have some success. It can be tested. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2011-12-15 15:02:19 (ID: 20084) Report Abuse |
|
I think the admin know now our idea and know what is possible in the engine and could think about a good formula.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2011-12-15 19:10:01 (ID: 20098) Report Abuse | |
|
Buffalo wrote:
I think a QB has his primary target in his mind before the snap. Depending on the coverage and blizing of the D, he would chance his target, if he is a good QB. So I suggest to add a chance that the QB can change his target. Yes, usually a QB has a progression he goes through...starting with his primary receivers and then working down the list. Generally, there is a fullback or somebody coming out of the backfield for a short pass that is the last resort. Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2011-12-15 19:10:43 (ID: 20099) Report Abuse | |
|
Admin wrote:
Pass Snap (C-QB) - receiverselection - block calculation (5 OL - 3-5 DL) - blitz calculation - coveragecalculation (WR - CB/OLB) - catching calculation - interception calculation - rush calculation, based on the point of catching and the left backfield Does this mean a safety is never involved in pass coverage?? Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-12-15 19:16:10 (ID: 20102) |
|
Solana_Steve wrote:
Admin wrote:
Pass Snap (C-QB) - receiverselection - block calculation (5 OL - 3-5 DL) - blitz calculation - coveragecalculation (WR - CB/OLB) - catching calculation - interception calculation - rush calculation, based on the point of catching and the left backfield Does this mean a safety is never involved in pass coverage?? Steve SD Blitz backfield means - depending on the position of the catch - LB, CB, SS or FS. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2011-12-15 21:53:10 (ID: 20152) Report Abuse | |
|
I didn't mean the run after the catch, I was thinking more about the pass coverage:
coveragecalculation (WR - CB/OLB) implies that Safeties and MLBs aren't involved in coverage. But perhaps that was an omission, but it doesn't list TEs either. Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 5 6 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / How we can to improve passing game. | |
