no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Teamrating Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
KingOfTh3Hil
|
posted: 2012-01-01 19:14:31 (ID: 21681) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
While you guys started a nice discussion, I spent the time and changed the rating according to my explanation. The point with the odd ST rating is very valid - and I don't have a solution for it yet. Let's see if this works better. Notice: The ingame ratings of past simulated games are not affected, only future games and the team page rating benefit from that change. And finally: yes, it is bragging, but it is a marker for success, too. So my stats for special teams is incorrect atm? cuz i find it wierd that i only have 17.3 % when i got 3 draftes on the depth chart for KR and G 
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-01-01 19:39:40 (ID: 21682) |
|
As said, the special Teams thing is a bit odd. Maybe I should remove it completely from the rating, maybe it should be calculated a different way. Let me do my database stuff first, maybe an idea pops up...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-01-01 20:16:13 (ID: 21691) Report Abuse |
|
Kottan wrote:
But there is another problem: some teams don´t use Gunners and Kick-Returners. They fill their DC with WR,RB,CB and SF and any ... And then there is the ST rating very low. And the Overall rating, too. Therefore the question is: Do we need to calculate the G and KR in the ST rating? I see no problem to count a WR twice, if he is playing WR and KR. The WR is YOUR KR and should be in the rating for the ST. By the way I like the actual rating more than the old. 
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-01-01 20:29:51 (ID: 21694) |
|
I found a way between all the glitches, and I guess I will stick with it. Check the news, within minutes
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
KingOfTh3Hil
|
posted: 2012-01-01 20:31:58 (ID: 21696) Report Abuse |
|
what did you do?
before: 17.3 Now: 69.1 Its an impressive increase imo.... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
SteMan
|
posted: 2012-01-01 20:33:37 (ID: 21697) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
I found a way between all the glitches, and I guess I will stick with it. Check the news, within minutes Okay. Will do so. But Pete.... do you ever sleep or do you ever do something else but RZA??  It is amazing how much time and effort you invest in this game! Great! And we cross our fingers that RZA will grow and grow and grow! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-01-01 20:40:01 (ID: 21701) |
|
Hehe, watching Charley Boorman "Long Way Down", and doing some improvement...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
SteMan
|
posted: 2012-01-01 20:43:18 (ID: 21703) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
Hehe, watching Charley Boorman "Long Way Down", and doing some improvement... Unbelievable!  Don't know how you do that all! You are the Football-Simulator |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2012-01-01 20:50:09 (ID: 21705) Report Abuse |
|
Pete = Awesomeness
Now I have another question about the team ratings: Should Special Teams be worth 20% of the total, or should it be weighted a bit less? Say: PaOff=21/RuOff=21/PaDef=21/RuDef=21/SpcTms=16 (for example/discussion) I think 20% works fine, but maybe there is a consensus for something weighted? Last edited on 2012-01-01 20:55:22 by Lee1950 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-01-01 21:14:17 (ID: 21709) |
|
Lee1950 wrote:
Pete = Awesomeness
Now I have another question about the team ratings: Should Special Teams be worth 20% of the total, or should it be weighted a bit less? Say: PaOff=21/RuOff=21/PaDef=21/RuDef=21/SpcTms=16 (for example/discussion) I think 20% works fine, but maybe there is a consensus for something weighted? It is weighted like the involved and available positions are... By this, it has a higher value if you have K/P/G/KR on the field, if only K and P are set, it is less. I will try to break it down by "involved players count", later |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Teamrating | |
