no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / New Thread about coaches Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 6 7 8 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
KingOfTh3Hil
|
posted: 2012-01-07 20:02:10 (ID: 22797) Report Abuse |
|
well, you could add that a player isent allowed to play out of possition at all.
A WR must play as an WR and not as an TE and so on. and if someone does he plays maybe 50% worse or something, This is drastic and maybe unreal but players would definitely have players at the "right" position if this would be a reality in this game. Exept for special teams ofc, there everyone would be allowed to play without penalty. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-01-07 20:04:08 (ID: 22798) |
|
I have absolutely NO problem with doing this!
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
KingOfTh3Hil
|
posted: 2012-01-07 20:05:09 (ID: 22799) Report Abuse |
|
maybe i posted this becourse i only play my players on a position that they have on the roster xD
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Kuensami
|
posted: 2012-01-07 20:05:31 (ID: 22800) Report Abuse |
|
What about beginners who have injured players but don't have the roster depth yet to cover for every position?
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-01-07 20:06:36 (ID: 22801) |
|
If we do this "harsh way", they would do what you could expect from then, playing, but it will be worse if the TE goes as DL...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
KingOfTh3Hil
|
posted: 2012-01-07 20:07:42 (ID: 22803) Report Abuse |
|
Kuensami wrote:
What about beginners who have injured players but don't have the roster depth yet to cover for every position? Maybe that new players will start with enough players so that it would not hurting them if 1 position gets 2-3 injuries. i dont know how big rosters starts out to be today, but then maybe 50-60 players? 45? Last edited on 2012-01-07 20:09:08 by KingOfTh3Hil |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
KingOfTh3Hil
|
posted: 2012-01-07 20:08:50 (ID: 22804) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
If we do this "harsh way", they would do what you could expect from then, playing, but it will be worse if the TE goes as DL... And to fully inform new players about this penalty, it could be added in the manager license in a clever way. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2012-01-07 20:11:20 (ID: 22805) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
I have absolutely NO problem with doing this! repost from page 1 of this thread: Proposal: Add a penalty for out-of-position (in addition to the AC hit). Options that have some sense of realism: A) reduce the player's Experience by 20 (from X to X-20) when playing out-of-position. Or by 50% (from X to X/2). Or by whichever is greater. B) reduce the player's Positioning by 20 (from X to X-20) when playing out-of-position. Or by 50% (from X to X/2). Or by whichever is greater. C) reduce Team Chemistry by 2% for every out-of-position player. (assumes 50-man active roster...) Some or all of these 3 would provide a better in-game simulation of the performance drop a team could expect when playing a CB at SF. Not saying I like any/all of them, just trying to help you keep the game working how you want it....so if these are any help, great! If not, I'm  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Kuensami
|
posted: 2012-01-07 20:11:29 (ID: 22806) Report Abuse |
|
Give new players a roster with 50 players, or only penalize players for using offensive players on defense and vice versa. Is there really much harm in playing a WR as a TE? NFL teams occasionally do it.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Kuensami
|
posted: 2012-01-07 20:13:48 (ID: 22807) Report Abuse |
|
Lee1950 wrote:
Admin wrote:
I have absolutely NO problem with doing this! repost from page 1 of this thread: Proposal: Add a penalty for out-of-position (in addition to the AC hit). Options that have some sense of realism: A) reduce the player's Experience by 20 (from X to X-20) when playing out-of-position. Or by 50% (from X to X/2). Or by whichever is greater. B) reduce the player's Positioning by 20 (from X to X-20) when playing out-of-position. Or by 50% (from X to X/2). Or by whichever is greater. C) reduce Team Chemistry by 2% for every out-of-position player. (assumes 50-man active roster...) Some or all of these 3 would provide a better in-game simulation of the performance drop a team could expect when playing a CB at SF. Not saying I like any/all of them, just trying to help you keep the game working how you want it....so if these are any help, great! If not, I'm A combination of options A and B: reducing both experience and positioning (by 25% each) would be best. Last edited on 2012-01-07 20:20:47 by Kuensami |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 6 7 8 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / New Thread about coaches | |
