Community - American Football Management Simulator
AdBlocker active? It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org. The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site. Thank you very much!
Main / Discussions / SuperCup Playoffs Search Forum
Navigation: |<   1 2  3  6  7  8  >   >|  
Poster Message
espen
posted: 2012-01-19 22:54:36 (ID: 24880) Report Abuse
I'm thinking maybe another round should be implemented in the playoffs, to double the teams entering it. (Yes, I'm annoyed my 13-1 record isn't good enough. )

But the way it is now, it's based on how many bot teams you got in your division, if you make it or not.
I guess the problem will be the same, if you double the amount of teams going into playoffs. But; 13-1
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Monkey
posted: 2012-01-20 00:11:49 (ID: 24898) Report Abuse


im sat at #51 but my last game is against 48 so i expect us both to miss out regardless of who wins due to it probably being a close game so the winner will drop down due to other teams beating bots easily
Quote   Reply   Edit  
NYDOGS
posted: 2012-01-20 00:17:13 (ID: 24900) Report Abuse
espen wrote:
I'm thinking maybe another round should be implemented in the playoffs, to double the teams entering it. (Yes, I'm annoyed my 13-1 record isn't good enough. )

But the way it is now, it's based on how many bot teams you got in your division, if you make it or not.
I guess the problem will be the same, if you double the amount of teams going into playoffs. But; 13-1


That's the magic behind a Cup... You never know if the random output will be in your favor or not... But at least, we have the luck to play 15 games before being kicked out
Quote   Reply   Edit  
jack6
Leverkusen Leopards

Germany   jack6 owns a supporter account   jack6 is a Knight of RedZoneAction.org

Joined: 2011-09-05/S00
Posts: 7095
Top Manager



 
posted: 2012-01-20 07:16:25 (ID: 24919) Report Abuse
I'm torn apart by this.

One thing is: yes it is not fair to not participate, because you played a tougher division than a manager with most of them bots or new teams. So going to 96 (one round more including a wild card week) or even 128 (no wild card, direct knock out for all teams) would solve some issues.

Other thing is: what about a 12-2 team? 11-3? There will always be tougher divisions and walk trough divisions. So it would help much, just transfering ther problem to a different level. Play hard and win and you are in ...

Torn apart ... as I said.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Buffalo
posted: 2012-01-20 07:23:25 (ID: 24921) Report Abuse
jack6 wrote:
even 128 (no wild card, direct knock out for all teams) would solve some issues.




Why should a team with a easy schedule get a bye week?

128 would be directly KO and an additional round.

64 playoff spots would be ok, too.

Last edited on 2012-01-20 07:25:48 by Buffalo

Quote   Reply   Edit  
Toni Gorilla
posted: 2012-01-20 12:36:37 (ID: 24954) Report Abuse
This reply isn't directly related to the SuperCup, but isn't there exactly the same issue regarding League Playoffs?

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the teams with most wins will enter playoffs, obviously. However, when there's 2 teams with the same "win/loss margin", next stat that's looked at is "points difference", isn't it?

Therefore the team that played more bots will have the advantage, although the team with the worse "points difference" may have beaten the tougher opponents.

That's also unfair!
Quote   Reply   Edit  
bellj
posted: 2012-01-20 12:58:04 (ID: 24955) Report Abuse
I don't know if it is so much a question of "fair" or "unfair". Maybe it is more a question of "luck" or "bad luck" with the division you end up in.

I got lucky this year. However, last year I won my Supercup division, but didn't make the playoffs so it was bad luck.

Adding more teams to the playoffs wouldn't make it more fair. It would just mean more teams get lucky enough to make it into the playoffs.

On the other hand, I would not have anything against adding more teams to the playoffs. This just means another game or two for my little Hippos to play before we make it to the finals. (OK, there is no chance of making the finals this season, but even Hippos like to dream.)
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Toni Gorilla
posted: 2012-01-20 13:17:44 (ID: 24957) Report Abuse
I wouldn't mind either adding more teams to the playoffs, as long as it doesn't mean the season lasts even longer.

Teams not making the playoffs already have to sit and watch a pretty long time, without getting any income (except for the odd friendly)..
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Ranagol
posted: 2012-01-20 13:30:32 (ID: 24959) Report Abuse
I'm with Toni on this one. I wouldn't mind more teams in the playoffs, but extending the current wait time for those who didn't make it should be out of the question. Altough I don't know how this could be done for example for teams that's gotten into supercup playoffs, league playoffs, and is in the champ of champ cup as well, without doing multiple games a day.
Quote   Reply   Edit  
Monkey
posted: 2012-01-20 16:50:25 (ID: 24980) Report Abuse
i would just be removing the bye week and putting the top 64 in a straight knockout set up that way it takes the same number of weeks as it is now
Quote   Reply   Edit  
reply   Mark this thread unread
Navigation: |<   1 2  3  6  7  8  >   >|  
Main / Discussions / SuperCup Playoffs