no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Playbook Discussions. Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Sisko
|
posted: 2012-03-02 12:19:38 (ID: 30969) Report Abuse |
|
Swordpriest1 wrote:
yeah.. his TC is 40%. couple that with a 17 in punting.... 16yrd avg seem right? I mean he's a 4 1/2 * talent so I'm not dropping dude but he's not gonna butcher my team like he did today. What about his strenght? Seems to be quite important too... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Swordpriest1
|
posted: 2012-03-02 16:49:29 (ID: 30998) Report Abuse |
|
Sisko wrote:
Swordpriest1 wrote:
yeah.. his TC is 40%. couple that with a 17 in punting.... 16yrd avg seem right? I mean he's a 4 1/2 * talent so I'm not dropping dude but he's not gonna butcher my team like he did today. What about his strenght? Seems to be quite important too... first off... something just isnt right when talking about punters and strength in the same sentence. But I'll play that game... 19 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-03-02 17:16:40 (ID: 31003) |
|
Swordpriest1 wrote:
something just isnt right when talking about punters and strength in the same sentence. I guess this is wrong! Sorry |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-03-02 17:20:11 (ID: 31006) Report Abuse | |
|
Swordpriest1 wrote:
first off... something just isnt right when talking about punters and strength in the same sentence. Ray Guy diagrees with that. Besides, we're talking leg strength.  Last edited on 2012-03-02 17:20:40 by dpierce |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
notsch
|
posted: 2012-03-02 17:35:16 (ID: 31013) Report Abuse |
|
It might sound quite strange, but in this game the skill 'strength' is defined differently for of e.g. an Oliner, the the QB and the K/P.
For Linemen strength probably refers to what we all think strength should be about...pure power. For QBs strength defines the arm strength of the QB which makes his throws more precise when going for the long ball. For P/K strength refers to his legs...so in my opinion it ain´t that bad to have 40+ players for all this positions. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-03-02 20:27:02 (ID: 31023) |
|
notsch wrote:
For Linemen strength probably refers to what we all think strength should be about...pure power. For QBs strength defines the arm strength of the QB which makes his throws more precise when going for the long ball. For P/K strength refers to his legs...  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-03-02 21:22:48 (ID: 31054) Report Abuse | |
|
notsch wrote:
It might sound quite strange, but in this game the skill 'strength' is defined differently for of e.g. an Oliner, the the QB and the K/P. For Linemen strength probably refers to what we all think strength should be about...pure power. For QBs strength defines the arm strength of the QB which makes his throws more precise when going for the long ball. For P/K strength refers to his legs...so in my opinion it ain´t that bad to have 40+ players for all this positions. And for Gene Simmons, it mean ... well let's not discuss THAT .... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Sisko
|
posted: 2012-03-03 12:23:19 (ID: 31120) Report Abuse |
|
And to come back on topic: 19 seems to be not enough... Guess 30+ should be the minimal strenght, while - like notsch wrote - 40+ is desireable.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
schnitlick
|
posted: 2012-04-21 09:47:49 (ID: 36596) Report Abuse |
|
Hi, I have noticed that in my last few games I'm getting strange defensive play calls. These calls makes opponent to gain a lot of yards and usually it is a turning point in the game which means = loosing such a game.
It specially happen when opponent selects I-formation and Shotgun 2WR. Computer picks up 3-4-4 and it costs me usually over 10 yards. but I have a different play calls in my playbook for these situations. I have also checked it in simulator and the result is a correct play call from playbook but in the game computer picks 3-4-4. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2012-04-21 18:58:57 (ID: 36668) Report Abuse |
|
schnitlick wrote:
Hi, I have noticed that in my last few games I'm getting strange defensive play calls. These calls makes opponent to gain a lot of yards and usually it is a turning point in the game which means = loosing such a game. It specially happen when opponent selects I-formation and Shotgun 2WR. Computer picks up 3-4-4 and it costs me usually over 10 yards. but I have a different play calls in my playbook for these situations. I have also checked it in simulator and the result is a correct play call from playbook but in the game computer picks 3-4-4. Sounds like you should post in Bugs. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Playbook Discussions. | |
