no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / wondering about formations Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2012-05-14 17:06:53 (ID: 39952) Report Abuse |
|
I'm just wondering when we might get some more d and O formation that are on the to do list.
Source This thread is the one I'm talking about. Just wondering what formation we might expect to see in season 5 last but not lest when will you fix the 335. I still have never seen a 335 run with two fs and a ss in the middle of the field like a middle linbacker all of them i have seen are run with a 3rd cb or a 2 ss which would play up almost in slot cb postion or back over top the cb pete made a link... Last edited on 2012-05-14 20:26:48 by pete |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-05-14 17:28:21 (ID: 39955) Report Abuse |
|
Deja Vu
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-14 18:47:56 (ID: 39970) Report Abuse | |
|
We are adding each single proposal on the test stage first. When a formation is working there as expected, we transfer it to the game. That is the way it was in the past, and I will stick with this way.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-05-14 20:18:28 (ID: 39998) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
We are adding each single proposal on the test stage first. When a formation is working there as expected, we transfer it to the game. That is the way it was in the past, and I will stick with this way. But how 3-3-5 have to work? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-14 20:24:25 (ID: 40002) Report Abuse | |
|
dark_wing wrote:
pete wrote:
We are adding each single proposal on the test stage first. When a formation is working there as expected, we transfer it to the game. That is the way it was in the past, and I will stick with this way. But how 3-3-5 have to work? I do not fully understand what your goal is with this question... 3-3-5 should bring a 3 DL line, MLB, one OLB on each side, 1 CB on each side, one FS on each side and a centered SS. We know there are several formations called 3-3-5, and it is more like an open scheme than an exact formation. But right now it is as described. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-05-14 20:45:26 (ID: 40011) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
dark_wing wrote:
pete wrote:
We are adding each single proposal on the test stage first. When a formation is working there as expected, we transfer it to the game. That is the way it was in the past, and I will stick with this way. But how 3-3-5 have to work? I do not fully understand what your goal is with this question... 3-3-5 should bring a 3 DL line, MLB, one OLB on each side, 1 CB on each side, one FS on each side and a centered SS. We know there are several formations called 3-3-5, and it is more like an open scheme than an exact formation. But right now it is as described. You wrote: We are adding each single proposal on the test stage first. When a formation is working there as expected, we transfer it to the game. I just want to know, how 3-3-5 have to work? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-14 20:49:02 (ID: 40014) Report Abuse | |
|
dark_wing wrote:
pete wrote:
dark_wing wrote:
pete wrote:
We are adding each single proposal on the test stage first. When a formation is working there as expected, we transfer it to the game. That is the way it was in the past, and I will stick with this way. But how 3-3-5 have to work? I do not fully understand what your goal is with this question... 3-3-5 should bring a 3 DL line, MLB, one OLB on each side, 1 CB on each side, one FS on each side and a centered SS. We know there are several formations called 3-3-5, and it is more like an open scheme than an exact formation. But right now it is as described. You wrote: We are adding each single proposal on the test stage first. When a formation is working there as expected, we transfer it to the game. I just want to know, how 3-3-5 have to work? Do yo expect me to write happens on the field? Or in the engine? I donÄt get it, sorry. For all: please recheck the suggestions board, there is new thread for suggesting formations. To allow fair handling, and fast handling, please follow the special rules I have written down over there... Suggest a new formation |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2012-05-14 22:33:34 (ID: 40033) Report Abuse |
|
on this onE
335 COLLAGE STYLE CBL/SSL/DEL/NT/DER/SSR/CBR/OLBL/MLB/OLBR/FSC But the SS play more of a slot cb or outside backers that is a real differnce but I dont know if it could be done that way |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2012-05-14 22:36:30 (ID: 40034) Report Abuse |
|
now 3 wide set which may not be vailed in the engine yet but if they would later become so and the basic 2 defenses to counter then with 3 CB
Shot gun 3 wide WRL/WRL1/OTL/OGL/OC/OGR/OTR/TER/WRR/QBC/HBL I FORMATION 3 WR WRL/WRL1/OTL/OGL/OC/OGR/OTR/WRR/QB/FBC/HBC BLANCE FOR RUN AND PASS SINGALEBACK NORMAL WRL/WL1/OTL/OGL/OC/OTR/TER/WRR/QB/HBC PASS FORMATION AS FAR AS DEFENSIVE GOES NICKLE CBL/CBL1/DEL/DTL/DTR/DER/CBR/MLBL/OLBR/FSL/SSR BLANCE FOR RUN AND PASS 335 PRO STYLE CBL/CBL1/DEL/NT/DER/CBR/OLBL/MLB/OLBR/FSL/SSR PASS DEFENSE Just wondering why they might be little bit unbalance WR wise that what the 3 CB defense is for. They are real formation used ever day in football. Is it more of a engine that can't handle it or sort it out? Last edited on 2012-05-14 22:37:42 by andrew2scott2 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-15 06:37:19 (ID: 40078) Report Abuse | |
|
andrew2scott2 wrote:
Just wondering why they might be little bit unbalance WR wise that what the 3 CB defense is for. They are real formation used ever day in football. Is it more of a engine that can't handle it or sort it out? It is not engine related - the engine can handle 0 or 1 or 2 WR per side, and 1 or 2 CB per side. It is more that "not so well balanced" formations are the key for exploits, I try to avoid. At least for the moment. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / wondering about formations | |
