no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / wondering about formations Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2012-05-15 10:46:02 (ID: 40130) Report Abuse |
|
I Understand better now. other question what about the 335 where the 2 ss safties play up in a cb slot or outside line backer?
Is the engine able to take that into account? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-15 11:07:39 (ID: 40146) Report Abuse | |
|
andrew2scott2 wrote:
I Understand better now. other question what about the 335 where the 2 ss safties play up in a cb slot or outside line backer? Is the engine able to take that into account? No, you would have to put them in as CB2 left/right then, as far as I understand your idea. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2012-05-15 18:46:37 (ID: 40219) Report Abuse |
|
I understand then but just to clear thing up this is not an idea it is real defense ran by WVU and some other collages and high schools here in the US.
On the other hand the real 3-3-5 ran in the NFL ran with 3 CB. Which there is no need to have here unless we have 3WR formations. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-15 18:50:08 (ID: 40222) Report Abuse | |
|
andrew2scott2 wrote:
I understand then but just to clear thing up this is not an idea it is real defense ran by WVU and some other collages and high schools here in the US. On the other hand the real 3-3-5 ran in the NFL ran with 3 CB. Which there is no need to have here unless we have 3WR formations. This here is a "designed" 3-3-5. Goal was to have balance between left and right, a small DL with two "blitzers", and a strong "centered" backfield compared to the Dime as example |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2012-05-15 18:57:15 (ID: 40224) Report Abuse |
|
under standable but it is unreal formation that has never been used that I have seen.
But have the 3 Safeties in a cover 3 stack over the CBL MLB CBR is also used by many teams. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-05-15 20:11:03 (ID: 40249) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
andrew2scott2 wrote:
I understand then but just to clear thing up this is not an idea it is real defense ran by WVU and some other collages and high schools here in the US. On the other hand the real 3-3-5 ran in the NFL ran with 3 CB. Which there is no need to have here unless we have 3WR formations. This here is a "designed" 3-3-5. Goal was to have balance between left and right, a small DL with two "blitzers", and a strong "centered" backfield compared to the Dime as example 335 COLLAGE STYLE CBL/SSL/DEL/NT/DER/SSR/CBR/OLBL/MLB/OLBR/FSC IMO better. Because SSC to close to MLB |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-15 20:13:34 (ID: 40251) Report Abuse | |
|
The idea was to have a very last resort on the flanks, since there are 3 tackle chances in the middle. The FS has a much better chance to catch that outer WR
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
slider6
|
posted: 2012-05-15 20:54:50 (ID: 40270) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
The idea was to have a very last resort on the flanks, since there are 3 tackle chances in the middle. The FS has a much better chance to catch that outer WR What is the difference in catching that outside WR between SSL FSC SSR and FSR SSC FSL. I would rather have the 2 SS closer to the LOS than the 2 FS when running a 335. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-15 21:04:32 (ID: 40273) Report Abuse | |
|
slider6 wrote:
pete wrote:
The idea was to have a very last resort on the flanks, since there are 3 tackle chances in the middle. The FS has a much better chance to catch that outer WR What is the difference in catching that outside WR between SSL FSC SSR and FSR SSC FSL. I would rather have the 2 SS closer to the LOS than the 2 FS when running a 335. Just suggest such a formation then |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
slider6
|
posted: 2012-05-15 21:57:16 (ID: 40288) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
slider6 wrote:
pete wrote:
The idea was to have a very last resort on the flanks, since there are 3 tackle chances in the middle. The FS has a much better chance to catch that outer WR What is the difference in catching that outside WR between SSL FSC SSR and FSR SSC FSL. I would rather have the 2 SS closer to the LOS than the 2 FS when running a 335. Just suggest such a formation then Well, I was hoping to find out what the differences are. Wouldn't the 2 SS formation provide better run support? While the 2 FS formation would be better against a pass? Based entirely on where the positions line up and disregarding the attributes of the players. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / wondering about formations | |
