no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Thx to this new moty Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 9 10 11 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2012-05-24 19:26:43 (ID: 42311) Report Abuse | |
|
You make a big mistake, all of you...scout the receivers too.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Tarjan
|
posted: 2012-05-24 19:34:36 (ID: 42314) Report Abuse |
|
Don´t set a new draftboard and ask me of having any more scouting
the ratio between incomplete and Interception is the thing i doubt if my qb is so bad then not even the DB is so close to the ball that he could intercept so many balls. And are all Int thrown to the flatzones? Otherwise the percentage of int returned for TD is even to high if the defense player is fast. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-05-24 20:09:59 (ID: 42322) Report Abuse |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
sfniner08 wrote:
His QB is just horrible. Correct! 
it becomes really better when the player are better! Here the results from my QB when playing in the Power Cup where all is at 40 Att Compl % Yd Avg(A) TD Int 43 14 33 388 9 5 2 64 16 25 397 6.2 5 3 Awesome realistic numbers arent it?  T-s-s-s-s-s-s!  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-24 20:13:46 (ID: 42325) Report Abuse | |
|
Tarjan wrote:
Don´t set a new draftboard and ask me of having any more scouting
the ratio between incomplete and Interception is the thing i doubt if my qb is so bad then not even the DB is so close to the ball that he could intercept so many balls. And are all Int thrown to the flatzones? Otherwise the percentage of int returned for TD is even to high if the defense player is fast. But should I spent a single minute on making these type of results more "realistic"? I doubt this. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Tarjan
|
posted: 2012-05-24 20:20:17 (ID: 42327) Report Abuse |
|
Sure Pete if a manager plays against his strenghts sure it´s not worth a second to be used to solve "his" problems but the question is, does this mean you got to have a QB/WR Combo thats has to be segnificant better than the Opposing CB/SF Combo if the Engine does this to a bad QB/WR Combo to a mediacore CB/SF.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-24 20:27:53 (ID: 42333) Report Abuse | |
|
Tarjan wrote:
Sure Pete if a manager plays against his strenghts sure it´s not worth a second to be used to solve "his" problems but the question is, does this mean you got to have a QB/WR Combo thats has to be segnificant better than the Opposing CB/SF Combo if the Engine does this to a bad QB/WR Combo to a mediacore CB/SF. No, it is not only this. If the following sounds funny, keep in mind I cannot talk about real skills A more or less developed team will have a CB with good speed and to return the intercepted ball quite fast, and the former attackers are slow and less , the interception comes to a touchdown. If a "sucking" QB is playing against DBs with more or less good interception skills, he will get it by these interceptions more than it would be good If the WR is having bad "beep", he will enter a wrong side of the intercepting DB... and so on. If all of these comparisons (the engine is doing simple math, keep in mind) is worse, the interception return TD will become true Of course we could spend thoughts on making it less harsh, but is it worth it to solve situations that are far away from usual gameplaying? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-24 20:29:49 (ID: 42334) Report Abuse | |
|
Have to add. I don't like hardcoded relaxe rules, guess why.
And if the exhaustion of the DBs does not solve the situation, then I guess the losing team "deserves" it. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-24 20:31:13 (ID: 42336) Report Abuse | |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
Here the results from my QB when playing in the Power Cup where all is at 40 Att Compl % Yd Avg(A) TD Int 43 14 33 388 9 5 2 64 16 25 397 6.2 5 3 Please tell your thoughts what's wrong/right with this numbers? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Tarjan
|
posted: 2012-05-24 20:33:08 (ID: 42338) Report Abuse |
|
I get your point, those to games show more or less the worst case scenario.
I have to admid that i don´t have no clue of programming such engines, i just think perhaps there is any possibility to "tell" the Engine, ok we reached 100 Points lets run the "Mercyrule" like it was in youthfootball when a Team leads by 50+. Simply to keep the score "realistic" Last edited on 2012-05-24 20:34:15 by Tarjan |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-05-24 20:40:30 (ID: 42340) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Turtlemania wrote:
Here the results from my QB when playing in the Power Cup where all is at 40 Att Compl % Yd Avg(A) TD Int 43 14 33 388 9 5 2 64 16 25 397 6.2 5 3 Please tell your thoughts what's wrong/right with this numbers? My opinion. Att Compl % Yd Avg(A) TD Int 43 14 33 388 9 5 2 64 16 25 397 6.2 5 3 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 9 10 11 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Thx to this new moty | |
