no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
Main / Monarchs / Monarchs 1.1 Season 7 Search Forum | |
Navigation: |< < 1 3 17 18 19 > >| | |
Poster | Message |
dark_wing
|
posted: 2013-01-22 07:01:51 (ID: 77759) Report Abuse |
Nogard wrote:
Prediction AC Conference AC East Winner will be the Dolni Chabry Patriots again. They were in the Leaguebowl in S6 so they will definitely in the Playoffs in S7. AC North Allways the toughest division. I think this Year the Aachen Killer Bees would win the Division but everyone could and it will decided one again by the divisional match ups. AC South it will be a more difficult way to the division title for the Dutch Tigers then last season, but at the end they will win it. AC West My division and I would play a good role. Secret Air Service was the division winner last season so they are the favorite one this season too. Wild Card With a bulk of luck I could have a chance for the Wild card but normally both Wildcards should go to the AC North. Strike Team has the same chance like me. NC Conference NC East Dreigau with 3 new opponents but they will win the Division. NC North The other Teams come closer but the Black Dragons will win it. NC South The Bowl Champion will win the Division of course. NC West Last year Gaternation was a surprising Winner of the NC West. I think this season Rivne Monarchs will win this Division again. Wild Card I think Wasserbube will take a Wild Card. The other will go to a team of the NC West I think and I pick the Drunken Sailors. Bowl-Game Leverkusen Leopards - Aachen Killer Bees Just change Aachen Killer Bees to Kharkiv Atlantes! |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
lasso22
|
posted: 2013-01-22 11:27:12 (ID: 77779) Report Abuse |
Nope...
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Chatral
|
posted: 2013-01-24 20:05:09 (ID: 78453) Report Abuse |
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2013-01-24 21:19:14 (ID: 78463) Report Abuse | |
Chatral wrote:
So, how did you all do in the draft? Did you get the players you wanted, and fill the roster gaps that you have? My first round pick, picked at #30, was #7 on my board - so I'm pretty happy to get someone from my top 10 picking so low in the draft. I got my 8th, 18th and 50th of my list. I did get basically all positions I wanted, only the 3rd rounder is a bit of a gamble. If he does not cap in strength early, he will be a good one, too. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
kyle-rowdy-busch
|
posted: 2013-01-24 22:32:14 (ID: 78482) Report Abuse |
i got picks 26, 58, 90
got a SF, TE and WR I love my TE and SF...the WR is so,so My SF was red-capped in speed, but 50 Intell...very wise My TE, always need a better one and I got one. Strgth is yellow-cap but he is agililty 28.7 and good block/catcher and trait pass blocker My WR, young 20, and yellow-cap in speed already 42.6 and agility 26.3 He is a decent 4th stringer or less. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2013-01-25 00:25:42 (ID: 78496) Report Abuse | |
Pasting my earlier reply in the draft thread...
I got my 1st, 3rd, and 7th players on my draft board, 2 LBs and a G. All of them have great skills (as draftees should), but they're a bit slow for their positions on my team. I had to move my top pick up front, but the (now former) LB should fit nicely on my D-line. I'll have to wait for the other LB and G to develop a bit more before I decide what I'm going to do with them. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Chatral
|
posted: 2013-01-25 06:11:58 (ID: 78504) Report Abuse |
dpierce wrote:
Pasting my earlier reply in the draft thread... I got my 1st, 3rd, and 7th players on my draft board, 2 LBs and a G. All of them have great skills (as draftees should), but they're a bit slow for their positions on my team. I had to move my top pick up front, but the (now former) LB should fit nicely on my D-line. I'll have to wait for the other LB and G to develop a bit more before I decide what I'm going to do with them. I also quite like placing LBs into the D-line. Good DL seem that bit harder to come by - perhaps because Footwork isn't as popular a training choice for Defensive players as Tackling, Vision or Positioning (I see Vis/Pos higher in more players more often than Footwork). |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Nogard
|
posted: 2013-01-26 20:51:23 (ID: 78800) Report Abuse |
1st game day is played but still very quiet here.
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2013-01-26 21:07:33 (ID: 78806) Report Abuse | |
Nogard wrote:
1st game day is played but still very quiet here. <- - - I've been doing that for the last three hours. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
kyle-rowdy-busch
|
posted: 2013-01-26 21:36:38 (ID: 78810) Report Abuse |
low scoring...pulled out a shut-out
Going over stats: A few PASS-HAPPY teams this season: Rank Player Team Passyards 1 Burt Baylor Down Under Devils 306 2 Greg Silvia Adelaide Crows 255 3 Cecil Nielsen Aachen Killer Bees 200 4 Garrett Santos Paxtang Black Panthers 198 5 Chris Merriman Port Adelaide Spartans 189 6 Ambrose Hinds Dreigiau Cymreig 168 7 Henning Schröder Leverkusen Leopards 164 8 Stanislav Chmelík Dolni Chabry Patriots 155 9 Aleksander Meyer Vilbler Wasserbube 151 10 Joël Duquesne Black Dragons 150 On the other side: RUN-HEAVY teams: 1 Heribert Kitchens Casate New Canaries 154 2 Tillmann Hartmann Leverkusen Leopards 136 3 Kristian Mombilo redbulls 130 4 Sum Yao-Yun St. George's Dynamo Patriots 119 5 Marcus Stanley Paxtang Black Panthers 97 6 Elliot Kidwell Black Dragons 96 7 Marino Marchiori Casate New Canaries 89 8 Matheus Rodrigues Panteras Assassinas 89 9 Petro Sedlácek Dolni Chabry Patriots 88 10 Kyrylo Kushnir Rivne Monarchs 85 Last edited on 2013-01-26 21:40:30 by kyle-rowdy-busch |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
reply Mark this thread unread | |
Navigation: |< < 1 3 17 18 19 > >| | |
Main / Monarchs / Monarchs 1.1 Season 7 |