no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Thunder / Thunder 2.1 - Season 7 Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 6 8 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
E Logic
|
posted: 2013-04-03 18:43:57 (ID: 89621) Report Abuse |
|
Ultrasofa wrote:
I would really like to know what points exactly make you think its all the engines fault? You might have a stronger team, since you have been around for quite a while longer, but going after the gamestats he simply chose his playbook more wisely. Anyway congrats to SoV. i have said it many times the summary of the game really does not show the whole story. it makes his offence look well balenced when in fact this was far from the case. This is a quote from the disscussion forum that will tell you to some degree why I am pissed. sh8888 wrote: E Logic wrote: i can tell you are just looking at the summary but you need to look at the first 3 quarters when he only had 6 or 7 runs and the rest were passes from the big- I formation and he was stiil able to get 4 TD against a mainly 3-3-5 defence. and be leading 28-27 going to the 4th quarter. I said it in my post about the first 3 quarters play by play because if you look at the summary it looks like he was playing well balenced yet it couldnt be more wrong. so until you examine the game closely i would prefer you not to comment as you are undermining my arguement when you have not looked at the game play by play. sh8888 wrote: I've looked at the whole game. The stats don't lie :- Rush from Big I :- 28 Pass from Big-I :- 34 The 4 TD's were from 4,5,2 & 1 yards ... so where's the problem with that ? ...... the 3-3-5 is a good pass defense, but it's not invincible. E Logic wrote: are you stupid?? FIRST 3 QUARTERS big I run 10 big I pass 38 in the secound quarter alone he passed 15 times from the big I and only had 3 runs yet by doing this he was able to score 2 TD in the secound quarter. by only using the big I formation in this way. yes he scored at close range but how did he get there. by consistantly completeted passes from the big I against a mainly 3-3-5 defence. so take in to account my tactics in the FIRST 3 QUARTERS my players vs his, my coaches, my players better experiecne and homefield advantage do you think he should have been leading 28-27 by the 4th quarter condidering he was passing from the big I 80% of the time in the FIRST 3 QUARTERS against a mainly 3-3-5 defence. considering all the facts if your answer is yes he should have been leading then you really are stupid. i should have had the game well wrapped up and his offensive should have been no where near as successful as it was but apparently the 3-3-5 is useless at stopping the pass in the FIRST 3 QUARTERS. as i said look play by play in the FIRST 3 QUARTERS and not at the summary which makes his offence look well balenced when in fact in the FIRST 3 QUARTERS it was far from well balenced yet he was able to put up 4 TD against me and be leading. only one team has scored over 20 points against me all season yet he puts are 28 in 3 quarters by passing 80% of the time from the Big I formation and take into account all my advantages like player quality, homefield advantage, players better experience and my having better good counters against his one dimensional offence then this game should not have even been close yet the engine has some how worked out the he should put up 38 points against me and win. RIDICULUS |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2013-04-06 14:28:04 (ID: 89925) Report Abuse |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -> Div 1
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buddy Ryan
|
posted: 2013-04-06 15:46:21 (ID: 89932) Report Abuse |
|
congrats & welcome!
and Chelsea tanked relegation because...?  Last edited on 2013-04-06 15:51:12 by Buddy Ryan |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2013-04-06 16:00:30 (ID: 89936) Report Abuse |
|
Maybe a Div 2 SB is as high as he dares set his sights.
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
E Logic
|
posted: 2013-04-07 10:57:11 (ID: 90053) Report Abuse |
|
hosh13 wrote:
Maybe a Div 2 SB is as high as he dares set his sights. my team clearly isnt ready if i can lose to superbasichumans on vacation so i decided to spend another season in league two. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buddy Ryan
|
posted: 2013-04-07 11:24:00 (ID: 90062) Report Abuse |
|
I think your team is ready for the 1.1, you just had really bad luck in an important game
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2013-04-07 11:39:19 (ID: 90064) Report Abuse |
|
E Logic wrote:
hosh13 wrote:
Maybe a Div 2 SB is as high as he dares set his sights. my team clearly isnt ready if i can lose to superbasichumans on vacation so i decided to spend another season in league two. If you can hold your own in Div 1, then financially you'll be ok, and by being middle of the pack you get good drafts. But most importantly, every game (or close to it) in Div 1 will be a real game instead of playing bots/noobs all the time. Between league and SC games this past season, I had ~ 5 meaningful and interesting games apart from the playoffs. Boring!  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buddy Ryan
|
posted: 2013-04-09 13:56:17 (ID: 90364) Report Abuse |
|
Congrats to SimKon and the Fraggles! Undefeated League-Champ!
 Last edited on 2013-04-09 14:16:51 by Buddy Ryan |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
xubtube
|
posted: 2013-04-09 14:08:03 (ID: 90367) Report Abuse |
|
Congratulations to the SimKonville Fraggles for winning League 2.1 Season 7 undefeated.
You were clearly overdue. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
SimKon
|
posted: 2013-04-09 16:15:18 (ID: 90389) Report Abuse |
|
Thanks guys! See you in the 1.1 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 6 8 > >| | |
| Main / Thunder / Thunder 2.1 - Season 7 | |
