no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Defensive Tactic Changes? Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2011-09-17 16:26:20 (ID: 10609) Report Abuse |
|
There are 2 items but they are both related to def tactics so I'm putting them both on this thread.
1. Will we at some point down the line have a goal line defense? That would be helpful for when the offense has the ball on say the 5 yard line or less. 2. Will we at some point down the line have a blitzing feature? It could be you can designate one player to blitz in certain situations, a sell out blitz, or even a computer selected player blitzes and you just check off a box to blitz. For defensive strategy sake it would be helpful to blitz in say a 4 wr shotgun formation in a specific down. It would mean more opportunities for offense and defense. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-09-17 16:53:26 (ID: 10616) |
|
Here we go
Formations: Whenever you feel to suggest a new formation, please put it like this into the forum: formation name: iformation formation type: offense lineup: otl|otr|ogl|ogr|oc|wrl|wrr|tel|qb|hbc|fbc I will ignore suggestions of really extreme formations, one sided formations. To keep it fair on the field. Blitzing: Already on the todo, and already in the engine and the playbook, but hidden for the moment. we had it some months ago, but I had to disable it due some odd things. It will come back, for sure. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Monkey
|
posted: 2011-09-17 18:52:48 (ID: 10658) Report Abuse |
|
Goaline
offence OT/L,OG/L,OC,OG/R,OT/R,TE/L,TE/R,TE/R,QB,HB/C,FB/C Goaline Defense DE/L,DT/L,NT,DT/R,DE/R,OLB/L,MLB,MLB,OLB/R,SS/L,SS/R Thats about right i think Last edited on 2011-09-17 18:54:10 by Monkey |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2011-09-17 21:17:47 (ID: 10693) Report Abuse |
|
Monkey wrote:
Goaline Defense DE/L,DT/L,NT,DT/R,DE/R,OLB/L,MLB,MLB,OLB/R,SS/L,SS/R Thats about right i think I thought the original is DE/L,DT/L,NT,DT/R,DE/R,OLB/L,MLB,MLB,OLB/R,CB/L,CB/R |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-09-17 21:30:34 (ID: 10699) |
|
Monkey wrote:
Goaline offence OT/L,OG/L,OC,OG/R,OT/R, OK Monkey wrote:
TE/L,TE/R,TE/R, not ok, only 1 TE on each side pls Monkey wrote:
QB,HB/C,FB/C OK So we have to change it a bit on the TE position. Any ideas? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2011-09-17 21:37:26 (ID: 10704) Report Abuse |
|
2 te's max on the line. 5 Oline, 2 TE, 1 FB, 1 QB, and 2 WR. The purpose of the goal line package on offense is to make it strong for a short rush but the wr give a little flex to throw.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-09-17 21:48:21 (ID: 10711) |
|
Here are the rules regarding formations...hopefully I did not forget anything...
Faq: new formations |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Monkey
|
posted: 2011-09-17 23:21:09 (ID: 10733) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
Monkey wrote:
Goaline offence OT/L,OG/L,OC,OG/R,OT/R, OK Monkey wrote:
TE/L,TE/R,TE/R, not ok, only 1 TE on each side pls Monkey wrote:
QB,HB/C,FB/C OK So we have to change it a bit on the TE position. Any ideas? without the 3rd TE standing off the line of scrimmage its just a bigI formation  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Monkey
|
posted: 2011-09-17 23:22:19 (ID: 10734) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
Monkey wrote:
Goaline Defense DE/L,DT/L,NT,DT/R,DE/R,OLB/L,MLB,MLB,OLB/R,SS/L,SS/R Thats about right i think I thought the original is DE/L,DT/L,NT,DT/R,DE/R,OLB/L,MLB,MLB,OLB/R,CB/L,CB/R could well be  that was just off the top of my head |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2011-09-18 08:39:19 (ID: 10751) Report Abuse | |
|
Goalline offense normally is a Big package with double TE like the BIG-I and then a 3rd TE/H-Back outside one of the TEs.
Problem with redzoneaction is probably, that it's not meant to have 3 TE, so maybe change that TE/H-Back to a second FB? Possible? Or define a H-Back-Position ... Goalline defense is a very wide field. Teams playing with their regular defense just with different alignments and exchanging normally 1-2 LB with D-Liner if more wight is needed. So every suggested formation is right and wrong, because there are several shades of defenses. This goes up to 6 D-Liner and exchanging corners to SSs or even LB. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Defensive Tactic Changes? | |
