no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Dragons / Let's talk about the DRAFT Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 10 11 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
K3m4li
|
posted: 2023-05-10 19:05:59 (ID: 100173958) Report Abuse |
|
linkleo911 wrote:
Later I will post something about the current class. What should I post this time? Ideas are welcome!  Maybe why the Draftclass sucks so bad in Season 52....I know you can't help it and don't create the players. I'm just frustrated   |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2023-05-11 14:18:16 (ID: 100173967) Report Abuse | |
|
I liked your idea! Let me show why this class is not one of the best. I have some data from S49 and S50 drafts. S51 is missing, sorry. Let us see some points:
- There are 47 players assigned as offense (8 QB, 7 OL, 10 WR, 8 TE, 8 RB, 6 FB). S50: 53 players; S49: 44 players. - On the other side we have 38 players assigned as defense (11 DL, 13 LB, 5 CB, 9 SF). S50: 35 players; S49: 43 players. - Special teams are 11 (2 K, 4 P, 2 G, 3 KR). S50: 8 players; S49: 9 players. - Per age: 24 players with 21 yo; 19 with 20 yo; 28 with 19 yo; 25 with 18 yo. (S51 ages). Average age: 19.4. [On S50: 23 players with 21 yo; 20 with 20 yo; 22 with 19 yo; 31 with 18 yo (S49 ages). Average age: 19.4.] - In terms of experience: 13 players with 4*; 23 with 3.5*; 26 with 3*; 24 with 2.5*; 10 with 2*. Average: 3.0*. [On S50: 11 players with 4*; 23 with 3.5*; 25 with 3*; 23 with 2.5*; 14 with 2*. Average: 3.0*.] - We have 57 players with at least 1 trait (S50: 56 players; S49: 63 players). 10 players have 2 traits (S50: 4 players; S49: 10 players). S49 was the last time we had a 3-trait player. - Only 16 different traits this time (S50: 15). There are no players with Stone Wall (S50: no players with either Strong Arm and Natural Leader). - The most common traits are Ball stripper, Long carrying, Slippery and Track Star (8). [S50:Track Star (14); Sure Tackler (7).] * Trait distribution: Ball stripper, Long carrying, Slippery, Track Star (8); Fearsome (7); Ball Manager (6); Long reach (4); Brick wall, Pass Blocker, Sticky fingers (3); Strong arm, Strong leg, Sure Tackler (2); Blocking back, Heavyweight, Natural leader (1) We have a couple more of special teams on this draft which indicates a couple less talented players on the board. We have an intermediate number of offense and defense players in comparison with S50 and S49. In terms of age and experience we have no difference at all from S50. The biggest issue seems to be the traits. We have less traits than in S49 and a little bit more than S50 (considering the 2nd traits). But I think the distribution is not that good. I am quite sure that the managers prefer a larger number of high speed Track Stars... Later I will post some more impressions from this board. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2023-05-15 19:12:16 (ID: 100174055) Report Abuse | |
|
Update:
Right now for the S52 draft we have this order: Pick #1 - ZSU (bot) Pick #2 - Rocky Mountain Monarchs Pick #3 - Incheon Aviators (bot) Pick #4 - Ueterlande 49er (bot) Pick #5 - BVS (bot) Pick #6 - -TOG- Gang (bot) Pick #7 - dERBENT CONVICTS Pick #8 - Ipso Facto Pick #9 - Miami Dolphins Pick #10 - Badalona Cheetahs Pick #11 - Godesberg Longhorns Pick #12 - Budapest Wolves Pick #13 - Gilets Jaunés Pick #14 - Mülheim Steelers Pick #15 - Cargese Dolphins Pick #16 - Nottingham Outlaws Pick #17 - Rio Dragons Pick #18 - Sfniner08 Pick #19 - Nippon Steel Pick #20 - Viper Pick #21 - Gardians Pick #22 - Nuthuggers Pick #23 - Mülheim Seahawks Pick #24 - perineum bandits Pick #25 - turigtians esports club Pick #26 - Alaskan Fur Trappers Pick #27 - Baltic Stars Pick #28 - The Pinellas Pikes Pick #29 to #32 - t.b.d. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2023-05-15 19:15:05 (ID: 100174056) Report Abuse | |
|
This is probably the single worst draft board I can remember. If I'd be judging prospects by my usual standards I'd probably have less than 10 that qualifies as 'draftable'.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
K3m4li
|
posted: 2023-05-16 04:45:11 (ID: 100174063) Report Abuse |
|
ChoadW wrote:
This is probably the single worst draft board I can remember. If I'd be judging prospects by my usual standards I'd probably have less than 10 that qualifies as 'draftable'. Thanks...I can only agree with that...I also find it very difficult to find players in the draft for the first round who might have a chance to play in the future...I don't even want to talk about the other two rounds....    |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2023-05-16 10:24:26 (ID: 100174069) Report Abuse | |
|
I'm barely even thinking about rounds anymore honestly, just hope that I either get someone I actually see something in, or randomly stumble into hidden developmental value.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2023-05-16 19:09:36 (ID: 100174079) Report Abuse | |
|
ChoadW wrote:
This is probably the single worst draft board I can remember. If I'd be judging prospects by my usual standards I'd probably have less than 10 that qualifies as 'draftable'. I have selected 12 players as draftable. But I am quite sure that other managers would s e l e c t something like 8 or 9 based on the common sense criteria. Let me share my list (in any specific order): - Deb Ganesh - Aapi Kumpula - Salih Rashid - Arvydas Costa - Wawrzyniec Gałecki - Muharrem Schreiber - Iurie Garcia - Matthieu Kupsa - Hélder Couch - Manuel Pérez - Srećko Flüh - Tinsulaananda Suchinda |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2023-05-16 21:54:53 (ID: 100174086) Report Abuse | |
|
linkleo911 wrote:
ChoadW wrote:
This is probably the single worst draft board I can remember. If I'd be judging prospects by my usual standards I'd probably have less than 10 that qualifies as 'draftable'. I have selected 12 players as draftable. But I am quite sure that other managers would s e l e c t something like 8 or 9 based on the common sense criteria. Let me share my list (in any specific order): - Deb Ganesh - Aapi Kumpula - Salih Rashid - Arvydas Costa - Wawrzyniec Gałecki - Muharrem Schreiber - Iurie Garcia - Matthieu Kupsa - Hélder Couch - Manuel Pérez - Srećko Flüh - Tinsulaananda Suchinda You have none of my top 3 even on your list somehow  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2023-05-16 23:00:34 (ID: 100174090) Report Abuse | |
|
ChoadW wrote:
You have none of my top 3 even on your list somehow
We can talk about it after the draft but I was quite sure that at least the #1 player of the class was in this list. But Ok. I think that my misjudgement of player talent is already famous.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
K3m4li
|
posted: 2023-05-17 07:55:19 (ID: 100174102) Report Abuse |
|
linkleo911 wrote:
ChoadW wrote:
This is probably the single worst draft board I can remember. If I'd be judging prospects by my usual standards I'd probably have less than 10 that qualifies as 'draftable'. I have selected 12 players as draftable. But I am quite sure that other managers would s e l e c t something like 8 or 9 based on the common sense criteria. Let me share my list (in any specific order): - Deb Ganesh - Aapi Kumpula - Salih Rashid - Arvydas Costa - Wawrzyniec Gałecki - Muharrem Schreiber - Iurie Garcia - Matthieu Kupsa - Hélder Couch - Manuel Pérez - Srećko Flüh - Tinsulaananda Suchinda Of the players mentioned here, 4 are on my top 15 list. We all seem to have different ways of analysing draft players. I'm just glad that Sfniner08 doesn't draft in front of me...last year he drafted the players I wanted right under my nose  
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 10 11 > >| | |
| Main / Dragons / Let's talk about the DRAFT | |
